FRESH AIR

UPDATES

When historical facts become unacceptable – the effects of UNESCO Resolutions on Jerusalem

February 2, 2017 | Shmuel Levin

When historical facts become unacceptable - the effects of UNESCO Resolutions on Jerusalem
news_item/jerusalem-1120372_960_720.jpg

Shmuel Levin

 

“It’s clear as the sun is clear that the Temple [in Jerusalem] which was demolished by the Romans, is a Jewish temple.”

Seems straightforward, doesn’t it?

Yet, in today’s post-truth world, such historical facts are no longer acceptable in some official Palestinian circles.

The above statement about the Jewish Temple was made by United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres in comments to Israel Public Radio. 

Guterres also stated that “no one can deny the fact that Jerusalem is holy to three religions today”. 

Yet, in response, Adnan al-Husseini, the Palestinian Authority’s Jerusalem Affairs Minister, demanded that Guterres “issue an apology to the Palestinian people”. Similarly, the Deputy Secretary of the Fatah Revolutionary Council, Faiz Abu Ita, stated on Palestinian Authority Television that Guterres’ comments were “infuriating” and “unjustified” from “ethical, humanitarian, and political” standpoints.

Further, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas’ Assistant Ahmed Majdalani also criticized Guterres for lacking “cultural knowledge”. Majdalani claimed “the statement is a strike to the credibility of the UN as a global organization that should stay to the side of the occupied people and be against the power of the occupation.”

It seems then, that the United Nations’ support for the Palestinians is now expected to include the denial of basic historical facts.

Even the Muslim Waqf, which has long overseen Islamic activities on the site, produced a booklet in 1925 stating that the Temple Mount’s “identity with the site of Solomon’s Temple is beyond dispute.” The booklet then quotes the Biblical book of Samuel II indicating that it is also the spot, “according to universal belief, on which ‘David built there an altar unto the L-rd…'” In fact, the Quran itself references the Jewish Temple, and Islamic sources have acknowledged that its location was in Jerusalem.

This is not to say that Palestinian revisionism is unheard of. In 2001, the then Mufti of Jerusalem, a cleric appointed by Yasser Arafat, stated that “there isn’t even a single stone in the Old City of Jerusalem that is Jewish,” and that “there is no proof at all that the Jews were ever in Jerusalem.”

More recently, since 2015, the Palestinians began a drive to change the language with which UNESCO refers to the Temple Mount area. After failing to have it declared a solely Muslim site, they submitted resolutions on Jerusalem “at every possible UNESCO meeting”, using only the Muslim name for the site.

This strategy brought success in a resolution approved by UNESCO’s World Heritage Committee in October 2016. While the resolution briefly acknowledged the “importance of the Old City of Jerusalem and its Walls for the three monotheistic religions”, it made no mention of Jewish ties to the Temple Mount, and exclusively referred to the holy site by the name it is known in Islam, the Al-Aqsa Mosque/ Al-Haram Al-Sharif. 

While some commentators have sought to downplay the significance of the UNESCO resolution, on grounds that it “commits the sin of omission, not of commission”, it appears that the Palestinian leadership does not see it this way. In al-Husseini’s attack on Guterres, he claimed that Guterres had “ignored UNESCO’s decision that considered the Al-Aqsa mosque of pure Islamic heritage”.

All for simply stating a historical fact, which no serious expert, or historian disputes.

There are then two takeaways here. First, one-sided UNESCO resolutions are not just words, but can carry repercussions down the track that can make achieving a genuine two-state peace harder.

Second, Palestinian leadership single-mindedness on this issue no longer takes account of basic historical truths, insisting that the narrative of an “occupied people” take precedence over mere facts. This is yet another blow to peace hopes, which rely on both sides being willing to concede some legitimacy and rights to the other party.

Tags:

RELATED ARTICLES

Fighters and military vehicles belonging to Syrian government forces intervene in the city of Sweida to enforce a ceasefire between Druze factions and Bedouin tribes. Syria, July 20, 2025 (Image: Shutterstock)

Druze crisis tested Israel’s Syria strategy

Jul 31, 2025 | Featured, Fresh AIR
Image: Shutterstock

Media Matters: Smoke and Ire over IHRA

Jul 30, 2025 | Featured, Fresh AIR
President Bill Clinton walks Prime Minister Ehud Barak of Israel and Yasser Arafat of the Palestinian Authority at Camp David, Maryland, July 2000 (Image: Wikipedia)

The silver anniversary of the silver bullet

Jul 29, 2025 | Featured, Fresh AIR
A protest in response to the death in detention of Mahsa Amini by Iran's morality police in Tehran (Image: Tolga Ildun/ Shutterstock)

Diaspora Iranians hope for more attention to the plight of the Iranian people

Jul 24, 2025 | Featured, Fresh AIR
Image: Shutterstock

An AIJAC letter the Sydney Morning Herald refused to publish

Jul 14, 2025 | Featured, Fresh AIR
Screenshot from a video showing radical Israeli rioters torching Palestinian homes in the West Bank town of Huwara in 2023

Myths and Facts about Settler violence

Jul 10, 2025 | Featured, Fresh AIR
D11a774c 2a47 C987 F4ce 2d642e6d9c8d

Bibi in DC, the Houthi threat and the politicised ICJ opinion

Jul 26, 2024 | Update
Image: Shutterstock

Nine months after Oct. 7: Where Israel stands now

Jul 10, 2024 | Update
Palestinian Red Crescent workers from Al-Najjar Hospital in the city of Rafah, south of the Gaza Strip (Image: Shutterstock)

Hamas’ impossible casualty figures

Mar 28, 2024 | Update
455daec3 C2a8 8752 C215 B7bd062c6bbc

After the Israel-Hamas ceasefire for hostages deal

Nov 29, 2023 | Update
Screenshot of Hamas bodycam footage as terrorists approach an Israeli vehicle during the terror organisation's October 7, 2023 attack in southern Israel, released by the IDF and GPO (Screenshot)

Horror on Video / International Law and the Hamas War

Oct 31, 2023 | Update
Sderot, Israel. 7th Oct, 2023. Bodies of dead Israelis lie on the ground following the attacks of Hamas (Image: Ilia Yefimovich/dpa/Alamy Live News)

Israel’s Sept. 11, only worse

Oct 11, 2023 | Update
Screenshot 2025 08 08 At 2.05.36 pm

Israel’s latest Gaza plan: Colin Rubenstein on Sky News

Aug 8, 2025 | Video
Screenshot

‘We cannot deny Hamas’ role in this’: Joel Burnie on Sky News

Jul 25, 2025 | Featured, Video
Screenshot 2025 07 11 At 12.30.23 pm

‘Time’s up for talk’: Joel Burnie discusses Antisemitism Envoy’s report on Sky News

Jul 11, 2025 | Video
Screenshot

‘Optimism’ for Hamas to ‘exile’ their power and create a permanent ceasefire with Israel: Joel Burnie on Sky News

Jun 30, 2025 | Featured, Video
Screenshot

Australian government’s response to Iran-Israel conflict ‘disappointing’: Paul Rubenstein on Sky News

Jun 17, 2025 | Video
Screenshot

UNRWA feeds the ‘Palestinian delusion’ of no Jewish state: Dr Einat Wilf on Sky News

Jun 12, 2025 | Featured, Video

RECENT POSTS

Screenshot

AIJAC deeply disappointed at misguided Palestinian statehood decision

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese (Image: Chad J. McNeeley/ Wikimedia Commons)

Don’t reward Hamas: Why it would be wrong to recognise Palestine now

The Hamas military wing released another video of Israeli hostage Evyatar David (Source: Reddit)

Appeasement has a price – and the hostages are paying it

Screenshot 2025 08 08 At 2.05.36 pm

Israel’s latest Gaza plan: Colin Rubenstein on Sky News

UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney (Image: No 10 Downing Street/ Flickr)

Gullible West’s Palestinian statehood threats are peak idiocy

SORT BY TOPICS