UPDATES

Israeli investigation explains the tragic incident which killed four children on a Gaza beach

Jun 12, 2015 | Allon Lee

Israeli investigation explains the tragic incident which killed four children on a Gaza beach
Hamas deliberately fires rockets in civilian areas

Israel’s military chief legal officer has closed an investigation into the IDF shelling of a Gaza beach on July 16, 2014 that tragically killed four Palestinian children, finding they were the victims of mistaken identity.

This tragic incident, which was captured on video by journalists, became the most frequently used by critics seeking to tar all of Israel’s operations in Gaza as deliberately targeting civilians without justifiable military purpose.

The investigation was launched last September and included “the testimonies of Gaza Strip residents who were, allegedly, witnesses to the incident”, according to the Military Advocate General (MAG) of the Israel Defence Force.

Significantly the area was “closed off by a fence and clearly separated from the beach serving the civilian population”, and was known to residents of the Gaza Strip “as a compound which was used exclusively by Hamas’s Naval Police”.

Moreover, the compound had been hit by the IDF in the days prior to this particular incident, including on the previous day where a container storing military supplies was hit.

“Shortly before the incident, an intelligence assessment… indicated that [Hamas’ naval] operatives… would gather [there] in order to prepare for military activity against the IDF”, the IDF MAG wrote.

On July 16, aerial surveillance caught the four youths – Ahed, Zakariya, Muhammad and Ismail al-Bakr – “entering the compound at a running pace” and they “were believed to be [Hamas] militants” involved in the “aforementioned military activity”.

Critically, “the figures were not identified at any point during the incident, as children” and “it would not have been possible for the operational entities involved to have identified these figures, via aerial surveillance, as children.”
After receiving “the necessary authorizations for an attack… and after a civilian presence in the area had been ruled out” it was decided to “conduct an aerial attack”.

According to the report the chain of events was as follows:

When one of the identified figures entered into the remains of the container which had been attacked on the day prior to the incident, one missile was fired from the air towards the container and the adjoining shed. As a result of this attack, it appeared that one of the figures identified was hit. Following this attack, the rest of the figures began to run in the direction of the compound’s exit. Shortly before their exit from the compound, an additional missile was fired from the air towards them, which hit the figures in question after they had exited the compound.

Summarising the facts of the case and taking into account “Israeli domestic law and international law requirements” a decision was made not to recommend criminal proceedings because:

The decision to attack was taken by the competent authorities, and the attack was aimed at figures who were understood to be militants from Hamas’s Naval Forces, who had gathered in order to prepare to carry out military activities against the IDF. At the time that the decision was made, the attack was not, according to the assessment of the operational entities, expected to result in any collateral damage to civilians or to civilian property.

Moreover, the attack was carried out while undertaking several precautionary measures, which aimed to prevent any harm to civilians. Such measures included, inter alia, the choice of a munition which was not expected to cause any harm to civilians, and the deployment of real time visual surveillance. The MAG found that the professional discretion exercised by all the commanders involved in the incident had not been unreasonable under the circumstances.

What the report did not address was the question of why the four boys were playing in an area that was widely known to be off limits, or where the erroneous intelligence about the expected gathering of Hamas naval commandos came from.

Nonetheless, the report did note that, quite properly:

inter alia as a result of this incident, the IDF has been working to improve a number of its operational capabilities, including technological capabilities, in order to minimize the risk of the recurrence of tragic incidents of this kind

Regardless, the incident yet again highlights Hamas’ immoral tactical doctrine of operating in civilian areas, thereby letting its own people, especially children, become cannon fodder for propaganda effect.

Some will dismiss the investigation as a case of the army acquitting its own, but they should be required to address the substantive Israeli claims:

Is it not true that this was a fenced-of area used by Hamas naval commandos and which civilians did not usually enter?

Is it not true that the buildings had been struck repeatedly by Israel prior to the tragic attack that killed the four boys and that military supplies had been destroyed there the previous day?

And given this, and the intelligence Israel reportedly received, was Israeli military behaviour therefore not reasonable in the context, as the MAG concluded, even if the unintended results were tragic?

More than this, what possible benefit could Israel stand to gain by deliberately killing children in front of media cameras?

Allon Lee

Tags:

RELATED ARTICLES


(Photo: Shutterstock)

The politics of the FIFA World Cup in Qatar

Nov 22, 2022 | Update
Taraneh Alidoosti, one of Iran's most famous actresses, appearing publicly without her headscarf and holding a sign with the Kurdish words for "Women, Life, Freedom". Despite the regime's bloody repression, Alidoosti has vowed to remain in her homeland "at any price" and support the families of those killed or arrested in the protest crackdown  (Photo: Instagram)

Iran’s protest wave continues 

Nov 11, 2022 | Update
8c2ebfa2 C3e1 A33a 9cdc 07bd16e00b2f

After election win, Netanyahu set to be Israeli PM again

Nov 4, 2022 | Update
Israelis are going to the polls yet again on Nov. 1, the fifth Israeli election in less than four years. Will this vote break the political deadlock? (Image: Flickr, IDF)

Israel goes to the polls – again

Oct 28, 2022 | Update
The complex Israel-Lebanon maritime boundary dispute appears to have been settled after many years of negotiations, with Israel accepting the green line in the above diagram, except within five kilometres of the coast (This map was originally published on the MEES website).

Israel-Lebanon maritime border agreement

Oct 13, 2022 | Update
A screenshot from a video posted on Sept. 17 shows an injured protester in Saqqez, Iran, being rushed to a medical facility. (Video: Twitter)

Insights into Iran’s protest movement

Oct 7, 2022 | Update

SIGN UP FOR AIJAC EMAILS

RECENT POSTS

Image: Twitter

Apparent mass amnesia at Brighton Secondary College hearing

Left to Right: Russian President Vladimir Putin, Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi

The Russo-Iranian alliance comes to Europe

International Atomic Energy Agency Director-General Rafael Grossi (source: Dean_Calma)

UN nuclear watchdog head’s shocking statement on Iran

(Photo: Shutterstock)

The World Cup and Qatar’s Hypocrisy

Image: Twitter

New Government will confront terror wave 

Image: Twitter

Apparent mass amnesia at Brighton Secondary College hearing

Left to Right: Russian President Vladimir Putin, Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi

The Russo-Iranian alliance comes to Europe

International Atomic Energy Agency Director-General Rafael Grossi (source: Dean_Calma)

UN nuclear watchdog head’s shocking statement on Iran

(Photo: Shutterstock)

The World Cup and Qatar’s Hypocrisy

Image: Twitter

New Government will confront terror wave 

SORT BY TOPICS