IN THE MEDIA
Israelis have voted to take control of their own destiny
Mar 31, 2006 | Colin Rubenstein
Canberra Times – Friday, 31 March 2006
AS EXPECTED, Ehud Olmert, the leader of the Kadima party founded by Ariel Sharon last year, won a mandate to govern Israel in Tuesday’s election, albeit one smaller than predicted. Kadima’s rise, and the dramatic decline of previously ruling Likud party, represents the most significant shake-up of Israeli politics since at least 1977.
Ehud Olmert has made it clear that his core goal is a new form of disengagement from the West Bank, being termed “convergence”, following in the footsteps of Ariel Sharon’s disengagement from Gaza last year.
Olmert’s goal is to set Israel’s borders by 2010, unilaterally or as part of a negotiated agreement. Kadima leaders say that the actual withdrawal process will begin in about another year after additional attempts to negotiate an agreement with the Palestinians.
The unilateralist strategy is seen by Israelis as a way to control their own destiny and seize the initiative in the conflict with the Palestinians. There is a semi-open strategy among many Palestinian leaders that through refusal to compromise, demographics, and modulated terrorism when convenient, the Palestinians can prolong the conflict indefinitely until such time as they are able to achieve all of their goals, including the dissolution of Israel. Unilateralism allows Israel not only to improve their security situation but also makes it clear to the Palestinians that the idea that time is always on their side is incorrect.
As Olmert recently stated, “The people of Israel don’t have time to wait 20 years for Hamas to mature. The state of Israel cannot allow a fundamentalist Palestinian Authority to dictate its political calendar”. Olmert, despite coming from a background on Israel’s ideological right, was one of the architects of disengagement from Gaza under Sharon, and will make the need for separation from the Palestinians his major focus in government.
Olmert’s first task will be to form a coalition government and this task in made harder by the fact that Kadima’s plurality was considerably narrower than expected. He will almost certainly look first to the centre-left Labour party as allies, as they are basically amenable to his plans for “convergence”. Labour did better than expected on a program of increased welfare spending. Olmert has all but ruled out coalition with the parties of the right. That means he will have to seek the support of either of two ultra-Orthodox parties, and other smaller parties, such as the left-wing Meretz and a new Pensioners Party which was the biggest surprise winner in this election. Coalition also cannot be ruled out with Yisrael Beitenu (Israel Our Home), a right-wing party which appeals primarily to immigrants from the former Soviet Union and was one of the biggest winners in this election.
Coalition negotiations are likely to take weeks to months to complete, if past Israeli elections are any guide. At the end of that time, Olmert and his new government will have to try and cope with the new Hamas Palestinian government while simultaneously feeling out Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas about the prospects of some sort of roadmap-based agreement to allow a West Bank disengagement.
Hamas has made it clear that its goal is to consolidate power in preparation for a subsequent round of violence with Israel, and will not offer Israel anything more than a truce. Israelis would have to be suicidal to help them prepare for a later confrontation, and will be lobbying hard to make sure that Hamas gets no support or direct aid unless it unequivocally does what the Quartet (the UN, EU, US and Russia) have demanded of it – agree to recognise Israel, renounce terror, and adhere to all existing Israeli-Palestinian agreements.
At the same time, the new Israeli government will be seeking international support for a potential series of unilateral moves – including withdrawing settlements and most military bases from the majority of the West Bank where the Palestinian population is centred.
While the Palestinian leadership will condemn this as both one-sided and inadequate, it will be difficult for them to argue with the fact that Israel is moving to give them much of what Palestinians say they want.
This election result shows very clearly that Israelis are eager for a two-state solution to the Israel-Palestinian conflict. In fact, Israelis like newly elected Prime Minister Olmert are more keen for such a solution than many Palestinians, including the new Hamas government, who continue to seek an Islamic state “from the river to the sea”. The next few years will likely be dominated by a complex and extended effort by Israel’s new government to put in place the basic outline of such a resolution, whether Hamas and other rejectionists like it or not.
Dr Colin Rubenstein is executive director of the Australia/Israel & Jewish Affairs Council. Previously, he taught Middle East politics at Monash University for many years.