MEDIA RELEASES

Joint statement on the University of Sydney

Jun 27, 2024 | AIJAC

Protest Encampment 4 Palestine (2024) At USYD 02

We are appalled and deeply concerned by the agreement that was reached on June 21 by the University of Sydney and representatives of protesters who had camped on the University’s grounds for the previous eight weeks. Many of the protesters were from outside the University, yet they were allowed to menace the University community and disturb campus life without challenge. They have now been rewarded for doing so.

The University entered into an agreement with a group acting in concert with the extremist Hizb ut-Tahrir organisation to participate in a working group to review the University’s investments and defence and security-related research activities. No other university in Australia has gone this far.

The University of Sydney agreement has been widely and rightly condemned as a capitulation by the University and celebrated by extremists. A group working in concert with Hizb ut-Tahrir declared last Friday that “[Our] resilience has worked in our favour across many fronts, most particularly being the catalyst for the negotiations with the Uni.”

This agreement can only act as an incentive for further and more extreme disruption at the University in the future.

Leading national security experts, including Peter Jennings and Dennis Richardson, have rightly raised serious questions about the University’s capacity to conduct sensitive national security research in light of this agreement. Others have questioned the appropriateness of continued federal funding to the University of Sydney.

Based on our interactions to date, we have lost confidence in the capacity of the University to provide for the physical, cultural and psycho-social safety of Jewish students and staff members. This is not just our view. We have been made aware that several academic staff, some of them leaders in their fields and employees of long standing, have already notified the University of their decision to leave the institution. We have also been informed that a number of Jewish students are now considering shifting to other Universities.

We have also rejected the University’s offer, extended to us after an agreement had been reached behind our backs, to participate in the proposed process to review the University’s investment and research activities. The process is in our view a sham and we will have nothing to do with it. We encourage all individuals and groups of standing likewise not to engage with or lend credibility to such a fundamentally flawed process.

We continue to explore all options to ensure the safety and wellbeing of students and staff at the University of Sydney and stand ready to provide support and assistance to Jewish students and staff at the University, as well as those who now wish to leave the University.

RELATED ARTICLES


The destruction wrought on the Adass Israel Synagogue in the arson terror attack on December 6 (Image: X)

AIJAC calls for urgent national action on worsening antisemitism crisis

Jan 21, 2025 | Featured, Media Releases
Image: Shutterstock

AIJAC relieved over deal to release hostages, but mindful of those left behind and ambiguity over Hamas’ role

Jan 16, 2025 | Featured, Media Releases
UN General Assembly chamber (Photo: Steve Estvanik, Shutterstock)

Australia’s votes at UN “starkly at odds with its own policy”

Dec 12, 2024 | Media Releases
Foreign Minister Penny Wong (screenshot)

AIJAC “deeply disappointed” with “moral relativism and factual confusion” in speech from Foreign Minister

Dec 10, 2024 | Featured, Media Releases
Josh Frydenberg

Senator Watt’s comments “disappointing and irresponsible”

Dec 9, 2024 | Media Releases
Screenshot

AIJAC horrified by arson attack on Melbourne synagogue

Dec 6, 2024 | Featured, Media Releases

RECENT POSTS

Editorial: Ceasefires and their purpose

Palestinians inspect their destroyed house after an Israeli air strike in the city of Rafah in the southern Gaza Strip (Image: Anas Mohammed/ Shutterstock)

A peaceful Gaza is possible

Israelis at Rabin Square holding welcome home signs next to photos of Romi Gonen, Emily Damari and Doron Steinbrecher, Tel Aviv, 19 January 2025 (Image: Vered Barequet/ Shutterstock)

A ceasefire is not enough for a strategic victory in the Middle East

(Image: screenshot)

Antisemitism database “first step of many more that need to be taken”: Dr Colin Rubenstein on ABC TV

The destruction wrought on the Adass Israel Synagogue in the arson terror attack on December 6 (Image: X)

AIJAC calls for urgent national action on worsening antisemitism crisis

Editorial: Ceasefires and their purpose

Palestinians inspect their destroyed house after an Israeli air strike in the city of Rafah in the southern Gaza Strip (Image: Anas Mohammed/ Shutterstock)

A peaceful Gaza is possible

Israelis at Rabin Square holding welcome home signs next to photos of Romi Gonen, Emily Damari and Doron Steinbrecher, Tel Aviv, 19 January 2025 (Image: Vered Barequet/ Shutterstock)

A ceasefire is not enough for a strategic victory in the Middle East

(Image: screenshot)

Antisemitism database “first step of many more that need to be taken”: Dr Colin Rubenstein on ABC TV

The destruction wrought on the Adass Israel Synagogue in the arson terror attack on December 6 (Image: X)

AIJAC calls for urgent national action on worsening antisemitism crisis

SORT BY TOPICS