IN THE MEDIA

Nukes or not, Iran remains a threat

Dec 6, 2007 | Bren Carlill

Bren Carlill

Courier Mail, December 6, 2007

 
AMERICAN intelligence agencies believe Iran has halted its nuclear weapons program. Since an Iranian nuclear bomb would risk destabilising the entire Middle East, this sounds like great news. But it’s worth looking beyond the headlines.
 
The National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) represents the consensus opinion of America’s various intelligence organisations.
 
A declassified NIE released this week states: “We believe with high confidence that in 2003, Tehran halted its nuclear weapons program; we also assess with moderate-to-high confidence that Tehran at a minimum is keeping open the option to develop nuclear weapons.”
 
Iran has halted its program, not because it doesn’t want a bomb but primarily in response to increasing international scrutiny and pressure.
 
Whereas some might point to this as evidence that diplomacy is more effective than the threat of force, take a look at the date. Only a few months before the northern autumn of 2003, America showed how easily it could overrun a major Middle Eastern country, Iraq. When Libya announced in December 2003 it would dismantle its nuclear program, the Iraq war was credited as the main reason.
 
That doesn’t mean America should bomb Iran. But it does mean that a diplomatic initiative backed up by a credible military threat has a much greater chance of success.
 
The international community has been ineffectively trying diplomacy with Iran for years. And it has offered to help Iran establish civilian nuclear facilities. But Iran keeps saying no.
 
If it was only interested in peaceful purposes, why does Iran reject all offers to help it develop a civilian-only nuclear capability? Why does it continue to violate the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), which is designed to reduce confusion over nuclear ambitions?
 
Relaxing pressure now would be a mistake, as the NIE all but says Iran will eventually develop nuclear weapons.
 
The two key points in the NIE report are these: Tehran’s decisions are guided by a cost-benefit approach rather than a rush to a weapon irrespective of the political, economic and military costs. This, in turn, suggests that some combination of threats, along with opportunities for Iran to achieve its security, prestige and goals for regional influence in other ways, might — if perceived by Iran’s leaders as credible — prompt Tehran to extend the halt to its nuclear program.
 
But convincing Iran’s leadership to forgo the eventual development of nuclear weapons will be difficult, given the link many within the leadership see between nuclear weapons development and Iran’s key national security and foreign policy objectives.
 
What does this mean? First, Iran can be pressured, but the pressure must be seen as credible. Second, pressure will work only if Iran’s goals for regional influence can be met in other ways. Third, as Iran sees a link between its foreign policy objectives and having nukes, it’s likely it will restart its program anyway.

Iran’s goal has long been regional hegemony. Nuclear weapons would deliver this. The only other way would be if America sacrifices Saudi, Iraqi, Israeli and Turkish security on the altar of Iran’s whims.
 
But this won’t happen. Therefore, it’s inevitable that Iran will, at some stage, resume its weapons program.
 
Enriching uranium is difficult. But converting enriched uranium into weapons is relatively easy. And since United Nations inspectors have previously found schematics for designing nuclear warheads in Iran, we can already guess in which direction the Islamic republic is heading.
 
But Iran isn’t there yet. It’s still enriching uranium under the guise of a civilian program. It’s for this reason that pressure must continue to be applied. Once enough uranium is enriched, it will be very difficult to deter a determined Iran. Therefore, now is the time for increased pressure.
 
Despite and because of the NIE report, sanctions must continue to be placed on Iran until it complies.
 
Bren Carlill is an analyst at the Australia/Israel & Jewish Affairs Council

Tags:

RELATED ARTICLES


Screenshot of John Menadue's blog

Writer Susan Abulhawa’s Australian friends

Mar 30, 2023 | Featured, In the media
Protests against judicial reforms in Tel Aviv (Image: Wikimedia Commons)

Israeli protests: Government forced to put judicial reform on hold

Mar 28, 2023 | Featured, In the media
Canberratimes Logo

Letter: Palestinian extremist voices were opposed because of their racism

Mar 24, 2023 | Featured, In the media
Israel's Supreme Court in session, January 5, 2023, in Jerusalem, Israel. (Credit: Eddie Gerald/Alamy Live News)

Israel’s proposed judicial reforms – Jamie Hyams on J-Air radio

Mar 22, 2023 | Featured, In the media
Image: Shutterstock

Why we need the IHRA definition of antisemitism

Mar 17, 2023 | Featured, In the media
Image: Shutterstock

Letter: Religious bigotry and racism have no legitimacy in public discourse

Mar 17, 2023 | In the media

SIGN UP FOR AIJAC EMAILS

RECENT POSTS

EU Foreign Policy Chief Joseph Borrell (Screenshot)

Europa Europa: Airing the Laundry

IAEA Director General Emmanuel Grossi: Snap visit to Teheran (Image: Lev Radin/ Shutterstock)

Behind the News – April 2023

Screenshot of John Menadue's blog

Writer Susan Abulhawa’s Australian friends

(image: Chinese Foreign Ministry)

Misunderstanding the Middle East in the wake of the Iran-Saudi deal

Protests against judicial reforms in Tel Aviv (Image: Wikimedia Commons)

Israeli protests: Government forced to put judicial reform on hold

EU Foreign Policy Chief Joseph Borrell (Screenshot)

Europa Europa: Airing the Laundry

IAEA Director General Emmanuel Grossi: Snap visit to Teheran (Image: Lev Radin/ Shutterstock)

Behind the News – April 2023

Screenshot of John Menadue's blog

Writer Susan Abulhawa’s Australian friends

(image: Chinese Foreign Ministry)

Misunderstanding the Middle East in the wake of the Iran-Saudi deal

Protests against judicial reforms in Tel Aviv (Image: Wikimedia Commons)

Israeli protests: Government forced to put judicial reform on hold

SORT BY TOPICS