IN THE MEDIA

Israel poll misleads

October 29, 2012 | Colin Rubenstein

LETTERS

Sydney Morning Herald – Monday Oct 29, 2012

 

As anyone acquainted with Israel and its people can attest, the conclusions of the poll of Israelis reported on in the Herald seem puzzling (”Poll finds Jewish Israeli support for segregation”, October 25). However, detailed scrutiny of the poll data and questions reveals that, in fact, the poll itself is methodologically questionable, and the interpretation being placed on its data even more so.

As in every other country with minorities, social gaps and some discrimination exist in Israel. But the government, high court and civil society are achieving much to reduce both – the number of Arab civil servants is up 78 per cent since 2003, well-funded programs exist to encourage and support Arab university students, gaps in welfare budgets are closing, and tax breaks and other benefits for communities under the current ”national priority areas” program disproportionately benefit Arab-majority areas.

The answers pollsters received regarding whether the respondents felt ”apartheid” existed in Israel were meaningless since the question failed to define this non-Hebrew term. Moreover, the study’s authors acknowledge they intended to use the word ”apartheid” to mean simply discrimination or a ”desire for separation” – not a system of legal and institutionalised racism. Furthermore, they concede that many respondents probably misinterpreted the word’s meaning.

The other question referred to, wherein most Israelis would oppose granting Palestinian residents citizenship if the West Bank was annexed, shows, not that Israelis want discrimination, but that they favour a two-state outcome. As other questions in the survey showed, very few Israelis want to annex all of the West Bank – but the option of saying so was not included in this question. Israelis oppose annexation precisely because they do not want to face the dilemma of either granting Palestinians there citizenship, jeopardising Israel’s status as a Jewish homeland, or not doing so, thus severely compromising Israel’s democracy.

Other polls show that large majorities of Israelis, often upwards of two-thirds, want most of the West Bank and Gaza to become a Palestinian state as part of a peace agreement.

Therefore, the article’s suggestion that the poll’s results indicate that the two-state model for a negotiated peace between Israel and the Palestinians is becoming ”no longer viable ” contradicts the data both in this poll and others.

Colin Rubenstein

Australia-Israel & Jewish Affairs Council

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/national/letters/machinations-not-confined-to-gillard-and-co-20121029-28dpi.html#ixzz2AdCU1ByR

 

Tags:

RELATED ARTICLES

RECENT POSTS

Moreton candidate Remah Naji (centre) with Queensland-based Federal Greens MPs (left to right) Max Chandler-Mather, Senator Larissa Waters, Stephen Bates and Elizabeth Watson-Brown (Image: Instagram)

Green extremes

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese (left) and Opposition Leader Peter Dutton shake hands ahead of the second leaders’ debate of the 2025 federal election campaign at the ABC Studios in Parramatta, Sydney, Wednesday, April 16, 2025 (Image: AAP/ ABC Pool)

Editorial: After three momentous years

LiberalVLabor 1200x600

The Choice 2025

Image: Wikimedia Commons

AIJAC expresses condolences on the passing of Pope Francis

Screenshot 2025 04 09 At 12.12.01 PM

Hamas sees live Israeli hostages as their “ultimate insurance policy”: Ehud Yaari on Sky News

SORT BY TOPICS