IN THE MEDIA

Carr’s view on settlements is counter-productive

Feb 18, 2014 | Mark Leibler

Carr's view on settlements is counter-productive
news_item/israeli-settlement-in-west-bank-60.jpg

Mark Leibler

The Australian – February 18, 2014

 

BOB Carr (“West Bank settlements always illegal”, February 11) has accused the Australia/Israel & Jewish Affairs Council of directing “a furious effort at trying to block” his “routine criticism” of settlements while he was foreign minister, “as if this were more vital than advocating a two-state solution or opposing boycotts of Israel”.

This accusation grossly misrepresents AIJAC’s position. As I personally acknowledged to Carr last year, there are various views in Israel and in the Jewish community on the extent to which settlements may obstruct peace.

AIJAC is a fierce opponent of boycotts of Israel and a staunch advocate of a two-state resolution. It is precisely AIJAC’s advocacy of this that led us to oppose his stance on settlements.

AIJAC acknowledges that whether settlements are legal is a matter of contention. However, it is definitely unhelpful when those supporting a negotiated peace categorically declare that all settlements are illegal when serious legal arguments and significant legal scholars suggest otherwise and there is no authoritative, binding legal precedent for such a view.

Ultimately, bilateral Israeli-Palestinian political negotiations are the only way a two-state resolution can be achieved. Making pronouncements that reduce flexibility and create unrealistic Palestinian expectations is not helpful to achieving the difficult compromises needed.

Israeli-Palestinian negotiations face numerous barriers. The Palestinian leadership is divided: Hamas, which rules Gaza, refuses to recognise Israel’s right to exist or to renounce violent attacks on Israeli civilians; Fatah, which runs the Palestinian Authority, continues to demand the inundation of Israel with millions of Palestinians whose ancestors fled in 1948, refuses to recognise Israel as a Jewish state, and continues to incite hatred and glorify murderers and terrorists.

Nevertheless, settlements are the focus of Carr’s ire. On their alleged illegality, he presents 1967 advice by Theodor Meron, then legal adviser in the Israeli Foreign Ministry. As Carr noted, Meron wrote that “civilian settlement in the administered territories contravenes explicit provisions of the Fourth Geneva Convention”. However, this sentence comes from the cover letter, not the advice, which is only unequivocal when it is applied to the since-annexed Golan Heights.

About the West Bank, Meron was much more nuanced, saying Israel had a right to establish temporary military settlements there, that Israeli civilians were likely entitled to return to their privately owned property in the Gush Etzion settlement block, and he even canvassed the idea of settlements in the Jordan Valley.

Carr correctly noted that if the Fourth Geneva Convention applies in the West Bank – a contentious point – Article 49 would forbid Israel to “deport or transfer part of its own civilian population” into the territory. However, as pointed out by eminent international lawyers such as Australian scholar Julius Stone and former International Court of Justice president Stephen Schwebel, Israel has done no such thing. Settlers were not transferred or deported into the West Bank in a “forcible” manner – as Article 49 implies and elsewhere specifies. They moved there of their own volition.

Settlements are an important issue and Israel has tried to minimise their impact. In 2005, Israel dismantled all 21 settlements in Gaza and four in the West Bank. Since 2004 guidelines forbid new settlements or the expansion of existing settlement boundaries. The vast majority of settlers live in major blocs, included inside Israel in all serious peace proposals subject to equivalent land exchanges. By contrast, the Palestinians have refused to compromise on these issues and demand that no Israelis live over the 1949 armistice lines.

Pretending successful negotiations revolve primarily around Israel’s policy on settlements only emboldens opponents of peace and distracts from other pressing issues. Foreign Minister Julie Bishop recognises this. She has returned Australia’s position on settlements to a principled stance and made encouraging successful bilateral negotiations the top priority. Carr’s insistence on a policy centred on blanket opposition to all settlements on the basis of their alleged illegality was contentious, simplistic and counter-productive to advancing peace prospects.

Mark Leibler is national chairman of the Australia/Israel & Jewish Affairs Council.

 

Tags:

RELATED ARTICLES


Tunnel under Al-Shifa Hospital (image: screenshot)

Hamas is using hospitals to commit “acts harmful to the enemy”

Nov 26, 2023 | Featured, In the media
Screen Shot 2023 11 27 At 9.31.02 Am

Disturbing propaganda “drip-fed” to student protesters – Joel Burnie on Sky News

Nov 26, 2023 | Featured, In the media, Video
Screen Shot 2023 11 24 At 2.46.31 Pm

Hostage release and humanitarian pause – Ran Porat on ABC News Radio

Nov 24, 2023 | Featured, In the media, Video
Image: Gil Cohen Magen/ Shutterstock

Under pressure, Netanyahu agrees to a ceasefire and hostage deal with Hamas. Are his days now numbered?

Nov 23, 2023 | Featured, In the media
Image: Shutterstock

Israel-Hamas ceasefire: The moral and operational dilemmas behind the hostage release deal

Nov 23, 2023 | Featured, In the media
Image: Twitter

A plea to the silent majority: It’s time to speak up for Jews

Nov 16, 2023 | Featured, In the media

SIGN UP FOR AIJAC EMAILS

RECENT POSTS

(Source: Pixabay)

AIJAC applauds Federal Government’s announcement of Nazi salute ban

Screen Shot 2023 11 28 At 9.47.23 Am

Misguided claims underpin journalists’ anti-Israel open letter – Colin Rubenstein on Sky News

A Hamas gunman reloads to continue the rampage (screenshot)

Deconstruction Zone: Witnessing the Horror

Anti-Zionists often preen about their supposed moral superiority and historical literacy for subscribing to the idea that Israel shouldn’t exist. Yet does anyone say Russia or China should not exist? (Image: Shutterstock)

Essay: Anti-Zionists and antisemitism

Due to the integrated intelligence picture being provided to field command centres, Israeli soldiers in Gaza are suffering fewer casualties than originally predicted (Image: IDF)

“Integrated warfare”: The secret to the IDF’s Gaza success 

(Source: Pixabay)

AIJAC applauds Federal Government’s announcement of Nazi salute ban

Screen Shot 2023 11 28 At 9.47.23 Am

Misguided claims underpin journalists’ anti-Israel open letter – Colin Rubenstein on Sky News

A Hamas gunman reloads to continue the rampage (screenshot)

Deconstruction Zone: Witnessing the Horror

Anti-Zionists often preen about their supposed moral superiority and historical literacy for subscribing to the idea that Israel shouldn’t exist. Yet does anyone say Russia or China should not exist? (Image: Shutterstock)

Essay: Anti-Zionists and antisemitism

Due to the integrated intelligence picture being provided to field command centres, Israeli soldiers in Gaza are suffering fewer casualties than originally predicted (Image: IDF)

“Integrated warfare”: The secret to the IDF’s Gaza success 

SORT BY TOPICS