MEDIA RELEASES

AIJAC “very disappointed” at results of Senate Inquiry into Academic Freedom

Dec 4, 2008

AIJAC "very disappointed" at results of Senate Inquiry into Academic Freedom
The Australia/Israel & Jewish Affairs Council today said it was "very disappointed" with the majority report resulting from the Senate Standing Committee on Education

Media Release

 

The Australia/Israel & Jewish Affairs Council today said it was “very disappointed” with the majority report resulting from the Senate Standing Committee on Education, Employment and Workplace Relations Inquiry into Academic Freedom. The report, released today, made no recommendations and essentially denied that there were any substantive problems with respect to academic freedom or political bias on Australian campuses.

“AIJAC’s submission showed, as does the commendable minority report, that there are specific, sensitive measures that governments can encourage. They would minimise problems of bias and help ensure the rights of students to receive quality, professional teaching, which fairly represents the best empirical evidence available and fully explores a variety of evidence-based perspectives,” AIJAC Executive Director Dr. Colin Rubenstein said.

“Moreover, such measures need not in any way interfere with the academic freedom of lecturers or the autonomy of universities, both of which absolutely must be preserved. But instead of exploring ways to do this, the Committee split on partisan lines, and essentially achieved nothing,” he added.

“We are very disappointed that the Senate Committee missed an opportunity to improve conditions for all students on Australian campuses. As we documented, there is certainly evidence of Jewish students at Australian universities experiencing problems with bias or intimidation, and we provided substantive examples of inappropriate behaviour by some lecturers.”

He concluded, “AIJAC will be taking our concerns about some aspects of campus culture and behaviour directly to Education Minister Julia Gillard. We hope and believe that she will prove less partisan and more farsighted than her Senate colleagues.

“The government can be responsible and proactive in terms of encouraging sensible and prudent efforts to improve outcomes at taxpayer-funded tertiary institutions, without compromising either academic freedom or institutional independence.”

For additional information, contact Dr. Colin Rubenstein on (03)-9681-6660 or at crubenstein@aijac.org.au.

Further reading:

AIJAC’s submission to the Inquiry

Senate Committee Report

Tags:

RELATED ARTICLES


Image: Twitter

AIJAC welcomes Federal Court judgment in Brighton Secondary College antisemitism case

Sep 14, 2023 | Featured, Media Releases
Image: Shutterstock

AIJAC welcomes announcement of additional Australian sanctions on Iran

Sep 13, 2023 | Featured, Media Releases
Jeremy Jones

AIJAC “utterly devastated” by the passing of our colleague Jeremy Jones

Sep 6, 2023 | Featured, Media Releases
Image: Twitter

AIJAC acknowledges ALP Conference decision to continue status quo on Israel and Palestinians 

Aug 18, 2023 | Featured, Media Releases
Image: CPAC

AIJAC calls on CPAC to end sponsorship by controversial fundraising platform

Aug 18, 2023 | Featured, Media Releases

AIJAC “profoundly disappointed” with new Government stance on West Bank, settlements

Aug 8, 2023 | Featured, Media Releases

SIGN UP FOR AIJAC EMAILS

RECENT POSTS

Image: Shutterstock

Noted and Quoted – October 2023

Hamas’ suicide bombing campaign in the mid-1990s, which targeted buses especially, severely undermined the Israeli peace camp (Image: Isranet)

Oslo’s failure: A Palestinian perspective

Transformative: The Abraham Accords signing ceremony at the White House on Sept. 15, 2020 (Image: Shutterstock)

The Abraham Accords at three

Israeli aid workers in Morocco (Image: United Hatzalah)

Behind the News – October 2023

Netanyahu, with US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and PA President Mahmoud Abbas in 2010: Despite his scepticism, even Netanyahu pursued the Oslo model (Image: GPO/ Isranet)

Oslo did not succeed, but what’s the alternative?

Image: Shutterstock

Noted and Quoted – October 2023

Hamas’ suicide bombing campaign in the mid-1990s, which targeted buses especially, severely undermined the Israeli peace camp (Image: Isranet)

Oslo’s failure: A Palestinian perspective

Transformative: The Abraham Accords signing ceremony at the White House on Sept. 15, 2020 (Image: Shutterstock)

The Abraham Accords at three

Israeli aid workers in Morocco (Image: United Hatzalah)

Behind the News – October 2023

Netanyahu, with US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and PA President Mahmoud Abbas in 2010: Despite his scepticism, even Netanyahu pursued the Oslo model (Image: GPO/ Isranet)

Oslo did not succeed, but what’s the alternative?

SORT BY TOPICS