UPDATES

Suha Arafat admits her husband planned the Second Intifada

January 4, 2013 | Sharyn Mittelman

Suha Arafat admits her husband planned the Second Intifada
news_item/suha.jpg

Since the Second Intifada, which commenced in September 2000 but unlike the first one, involved massive armed terrorism against Israeli civilians, there has been an ongoing debate as to its origins. Israeli security sources have long maintained it was premeditated by the late Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat following his rejection of a generous peace deal at the President Clinton organised Camp David summit, but many Palestinians claim it erupted ‘spontaneously’ in response to a controversial visit to the Temple Mount by then Israeli opposition leader (and later Prime Minister) Ariel Sharon.

This debate has finally come to an end, with Yasser Arafat’s wife Suha admitting on Dubai TV on December 16 that her husband planned the Second Intifada (see clip) and told her about it before he launched it. According to a translation by the Middle East Media Research Institute, Suha Arafat told Dubai TV:

“Immediately after the failure of the Camp David [negotiations], I met him in Paris upon his return…. Camp David had failed, and he said to me, ‘You should remain in Paris.’ I asked him why, and he said, ‘Because I am going to start an intifada. They want me to betray the Palestinian cause. They want me to give up on our principles, and I will not do so.

I do not want Zahwa’s [Arafat’s daughter’s] friends in the future to say that Yasser Arafat abandoned the Palestinian cause and principles. I might be martyred, but I shall bequeath our historical heritage to Zahwa and to the children of Palestine.”

The Second Intifada lasted from 2000-2005 and resulted in thousands of deaths of both Israelis and Palestinians. It is tragic that Arafat believed that accepting the generus Camp David offer which would have established a Palestinian state on the West Bank, Gaza and parts of east Jerusalem, would have meant that he “abandoned the Palestinian cause” and instead chose such violence, with all the suffering it entailed for both sides. Sadly, this same attitude among many Palestinian leaders – the belief that accepting the sort of final two-state peace most international actors want to see and Israel has repeatedly offered amounts to a betrayal of “Palestinian principles” – remains probably the greatest barrier to a realistic peace today.

Sharyn Mittelman

 

 

Tags:

RELATED ARTICLES

RECENT POSTS

President Trump with his Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff (Image: Whitehouse.gov)

Will Trump’s plan give peace a chance in Gaza?

Leeser Burns

AIJAC congratulates MPs Josh Burns and Julian Leeser on the McKinnon Prize

Celebration in Hostage Square, Tel Aviv (Image: Dana Reany/ X)

Good news, but the world must make sure Hamas falls in line

The infamous scenes outside the Sydney opera House, October 2023 (Screenshot)

AIJAC applauds NSW Court of Appeal decision to block Oct. 7 celebration at the Opera House

Image: Shutterstock

AIJAC welcomes news of agreement on first phase of Israel-Hamas peace plan

SORT BY TOPICS