IN THE MEDIA

Letter: Foggy thinking on Israel’s “occupation”

Jun 24, 2014 | Colin Rubenstein

Australian Financial Review – 24 June 2014

 

Laura Tingle makes the unsubstantiated, ill-informed claim that the Australian Government’s articulation of its position on east Jerusalem was a result of the “Israel lobby” switching its “funding allegiance” to the Coalition (“The fog of war rolls from Jerusalem to Canberra”, AFR 20 June). This is not simply a fiction, but deeply offensive.

Tingle suggests using the term “disputed” is not balanced because it is Israel’s preferred term. However, this word is more correct at international law than her preferred term, “Occupied”. Israel controls the City as a consequence of the outcome of its defensive actions in the 1967 war started by Jordan. Jordan seizure of the territory in 1948 was never recognized internationally, nor in international law, and in any case renounced any claims in 1988. And there has never been a Palestinian state.

Given “occupation” only occurs at international law when one sovereign state takes control from another state, Israel’s claim to the area is at least as strong as that of any other party.

Importantly, UN Security Council resolution 242 in 1967 requires Israel to withdraw from “territories” in exchange for peace, (not “the” territories as John Kerin wrote in his 20 June article on this issue). The lead drafters of the resolution have made clear that this was written specifically to indicate that the boundaries would need to be settled by negotiations, which shows they regarded the parties as having competing claims.

Furthermore, the use of neutral terms such as “disputed” is more conducive to peace. If the Palestinians are continually encouraged by the use of loaded terms such as “occupied” to believe that they can achieve their state through international pressure on Israel, they are less likely to make the negotiated compromises necessary for a two-state resolution.

 

Colin Rubenstein
Australia/Israel & Jewish Affairs Council
South Melbourne

Tags:

RELATED ARTICLES


The first  documented image of an Iranian Shahed-136 (Geranium-2 in Russian) in Ukraine. Unlike most of its allies, Australia has yet to even condemn Iran for providing such weapons to Russia, much less impose sanctions (source: Twitter/@kms_d4k)

Australia’s inaction on Iran sends a dangerous message to China

Nov 16, 2022 | Featured, Fresh AIR, In the media
Image: Pinterest

A scandalous World Cup

Nov 16, 2022 | Featured, In the media
Image: Roman Yanushevsky/ Shutterstock)

A deep dive into the Israeli election results

Nov 10, 2022 | Featured, In the media
Image: Twitter

Australia should assist the struggling women of Iran  

Nov 8, 2022 | Featured, In the media
Screen Shot 2022 11 04 At 10.53.06 Am

Israeli elections – Colin Rubenstein on Sky News’ Bolt Report

Nov 4, 2022 | Featured, In the media
Screen Shot 2022 11 03 At 3.17.19 Pm

Good or bad? Benjamin Netanyahu likely to regain power in Israel – AIJAC’s Ran Porat on Ticker News

Nov 3, 2022 | Featured, In the media

SIGN UP FOR AIJAC EMAILS

RECENT POSTS

Aryeh Shechopek, the teenager killed in the terrorist attack (Image:Twitter)

AIJAC Condemns Jerusalem Terror Attacks

(Image: Wikipedia)

The View From Inside Saudi Arabia

(Image: Wikipedia)

Myths and Facts About Israel’s Left-Right Divide

(Image: Flickr)

Submission to the Inquiry into the Human Rights Implications of Recent Violence in Iran

(MK Itamar Ben-Gvir. Credit: Wikipedia)

Ben-Gvir and Israeli Liberal Democracy

Aryeh Shechopek, the teenager killed in the terrorist attack (Image:Twitter)

AIJAC Condemns Jerusalem Terror Attacks

(Image: Wikipedia)

The View From Inside Saudi Arabia

(Image: Wikipedia)

Myths and Facts About Israel’s Left-Right Divide

(Image: Flickr)

Submission to the Inquiry into the Human Rights Implications of Recent Violence in Iran

(MK Itamar Ben-Gvir. Credit: Wikipedia)

Ben-Gvir and Israeli Liberal Democracy

SORT BY TOPICS