MEDIA RELEASES

AIJAC statement on Foreign Minister Bishop’s forthcoming visit to Iran

Apr 9, 2015

AIJAC statement on Foreign Minister Bishop's forthcoming visit to Iran
news_item/aijac_260x180_.jpg

Statement

 

Knowing Foreign Minister Julie Bishop’s principled views, AIJAC is hopeful that, on her controversial visit to Iran, she will express her disapproval in the strongest terms possible of the Iranian leadership’s continued calls for the destruction of Israel, its promotion of terrorism and its fanatical propagation of antisemitism.

In the midst of the nuclear negotiations which concluded last week, Mohammad Reza Naqdi, the Commander of the Basij militia of Iran’s Revolutionary Guards, declared that erasing Israel from the map is non-negotiable, while in March, her host, supposedly moderate Foreign Minister Javad Zarif, said Israel “should be annihilated”. We therefore hope that our Foreign Minister will make clear the complete unacceptability of this attitude and will stress the importance of the Iranian leadership acknowledging Israel’s right to exist as part of any final agreement.

It is also imperative that the Iranian leaders hear from Ms Bishop that the West is willing and able to defend its values and interests, and that no nuclear weaponisation by Iran is acceptable under any circumstances.

Well aware that many crucial details still need to be settled before June 30 to create a better, more reasonable deal, we are hopeful she will explain to the Iranians the importance of tightening up verification and providing remedies for inspection inadequacies and of linking sanctions relief to improved Iranian behaviour with agreed, workable enforcement mechanisms for violations.

Important US allies, including Australia, should use whatever influence we have to ensure that any ultimate deal is effective in limiting Iran’s nuclear aspirations and doesn’t prematurely confer unwarranted legitimacy on an unreformed, aggressive, expansionist rival.

As our Foreign Minister well understands, the implications of Iran’s nuclear ambitions are so far-reaching, and the consequences of a bad, ineffective deal so dire – reviving the economy and strength of a radical Islamist regime and making it even more threatening to its neighbours behind its nuclear shield – that it’s crucial for our own national interest that any deal signed deprives Teheran of any path to a nuclear capability or bomb.

 

Additional comment:

We are deeply concerned that this unsigned framework agreement will leave Iran a nuclear threshold state, with its nuclear infrastructure, including its research, missile program and military facilities, left intact. There are self-evident weaknesses in the critical verification and inspection provisions. These include the lack of clarity on how violations will be dealt with and on which sanctions would be lifted, and when and how they could be re-imposed. These critical details need to be resolved satisfactorily and then agreed to by Iran by June 30. While any ultimate deal must ensure that the terror-supporting, expansionist, fundamentalist regime in Teheran is prevented from acquiring nuclear weapons capability, this framework risks conceding Iran precisely that nuclear status and the ability to assert further regional dominance.

 

Tags:

RELATED ARTICLES


Screenshot 2024 02 15 At 6.22.56 pm

AIJAC disappointed with Prime Ministers’ statement on Rafah that appears “divorced from reality”

Feb 15, 2024 | Featured, Media Releases
The International Court of Justice prepares to deliver its findings on Jan. 26.

AIJAC pleased ICJ permitted Israel’s just war of self-defence against Hamas to continue

Jan 27, 2024 | Featured, Media Releases
Image: Shutterstock

AIJAC welcomes new Australian sanctions targeting Hamas, Hezbollah, PIJ and the IRGC

Jan 23, 2024 | Featured, Media Releases
Image: X/Twitter

AIJAC disappointed FM Senator Penny Wong not visiting Israeli communities devastated on October 7

Jan 15, 2024 | Featured, Media Releases
The Peace Palace in The Hague, Netherlands, the administrative building for international law, and the International Court of Justice (Image: Shutterstock)

South Africa’s ICJ “genocide” case against Israel “cynical and politicised act of lawfare”

Jan 12, 2024 | Featured, Media Releases
Image: X/ Twitter

AIJAC questions Australia co-signing “counter-productive” statement on settler violence

Dec 18, 2023 | Featured, Media Releases

SIGN UP FOR AIJAC EMAILS

RECENT POSTS

Plans designed to keep Hamas more focused
on governing than fighting never worked
(Image: Shutterstock)

Essay: Militancy over Governance

Fighting but also learning: Israeli soldiers in Gaza (Image: IDF)

“An absolutely unique form of enemy”

New Palestinian leadership needed, but not in the mould of Haj Amin al-Husseini, Yasser Arafat or Mahmoud Abbas (Images: Wikimedia Commons)

Want two states? Build a better Palestinian leadership

Image: Shutterstock

Media Microscope: Doxx-land

Security forces of the Palestinian National Authority in Bethlehem (Image: Shutterstock)

Two states talk is hopeless without enforcement

Plans designed to keep Hamas more focused
on governing than fighting never worked
(Image: Shutterstock)

Essay: Militancy over Governance

Fighting but also learning: Israeli soldiers in Gaza (Image: IDF)

“An absolutely unique form of enemy”

New Palestinian leadership needed, but not in the mould of Haj Amin al-Husseini, Yasser Arafat or Mahmoud Abbas (Images: Wikimedia Commons)

Want two states? Build a better Palestinian leadership

Image: Shutterstock

Media Microscope: Doxx-land

Security forces of the Palestinian National Authority in Bethlehem (Image: Shutterstock)

Two states talk is hopeless without enforcement

SORT BY TOPICS