MEDIA RELEASES

AIJAC Statement: Israel’s controversial settlements regulation bill

Feb 8, 2017

AIJAC Statement: Israel's controversial settlements regulation bill
news_item/DailyLifeIsraeliSettlementp3gIPn1bcppl_.jpg

The Australia/Israel & Jewish Affairs Council (AIJAC) today released the following statement expressing concern over the controversial passage on Monday night of the settlements regulation bill in Israel’s Knesset, which would retroactively legalise settlement outposts built on land owned by Palestinians while providing compensation in return:

 

“While just about everyone – including Israel’s Attorney General Avichai Mandelblit, Israeli and foreign international law experts, and Defence Minister Avigdor Lieberman – agrees that Israel’s Supreme Court will likely strike down this law, AIJAC believes that it remains a counter-productive and unwise piece of legislation aimed at pandering to fringe constituencies at the expense of Israel’s integrity and image abroad.

“The biggest barrier to peace at the moment is the Palestinian refusal to negotiate, not settlements – which comprise just one of the contentious final status issues that must be negotiated directly between Israel and the Palestinians, and one whose importance has often been exaggerated and distorted. However, this unhelpful law seems likely to make resolving that issue more difficult when and if the Palestinians end their self-destructive boycott of the negotiating table.

“It also is important to remember that settlements still comprise less than two percent of the land in the West Bank, and this law will not substantively change that reality, nor is it likely to result in any new housing being built. Moreover, one must not lose sight of the fact that – even in the unlikely event this law was to stand up to a Court challenge – it would not prevent any future Israeli government from implementing the painful withdrawals from territory that would constitute a Palestinian state, as provided for in the previous peace offers Israel made to, but ignored by, the Palestinians in 2000, 2001 and 2008.

“Yet while the negative effects of this new law should not be exaggerated or distorted, AIJAC nonetheless remains concerned that it does not serve the long term interests of Israel, including the nurturing of circumstances conducive to an eventual negotiated two-state resolution.”

Mark Leibler, AC – National Chairman
Dr. Colin Rubenstein, AM – Executive Director

 

Tags:

RELATED ARTICLES


Image: Shutterstock

AIJAC welcomes additional Iran sanctions

Mar 21, 2023 | Featured, Media Releases
FrfQGIYaIAAu39s

AIJAC backs “tough measures” against neo-Nazis

Mar 20, 2023 | Featured, Media Releases
Image: Twitter

AIJAC expresses dismay at lives lost, but strongly condemns violent rioting by settlers in Huwara

Feb 28, 2023 | Featured, Media Releases
Former ABC Jerusalem-based producer Fouad Abu Ghosh (Image: Nancy Rosenbaum/ Flickr)

AIJAC welcomes announcement controversial producer is no longer employed by ABC

Feb 15, 2023 | Featured, Media Releases
Image: Israel Foreign Ministry Twitter

AIJAC condemns deadly Jerusalem terror attack

Jan 28, 2023 | Featured, Media Releases
NSW premier Dominic Perrottet apologises for wearing a Nazi uniform to his 21st birthday "fancy dress" party (screenshot)

AIJAC’s statement on the Perrottet Nazi uniform controversy

Jan 13, 2023 | Featured, Media Releases

SIGN UP FOR AIJAC EMAILS

RECENT POSTS

Image: Shutterstock

AIJAC welcomes additional Iran sanctions

FrfQGIYaIAAu39s

AIJAC backs “tough measures” against neo-Nazis

Susan Abulhawa (Image: Wikimedia Commons)

Abulhawa exposed by the ABC, which then buried the story

Image: Shutterstock

Why we need the IHRA definition of antisemitism

Image: Shutterstock

Letter: Religious bigotry, and racism, have no legitimacy in public discourse

Image: Shutterstock

AIJAC welcomes additional Iran sanctions

FrfQGIYaIAAu39s

AIJAC backs “tough measures” against neo-Nazis

Susan Abulhawa (Image: Wikimedia Commons)

Abulhawa exposed by the ABC, which then buried the story

Image: Shutterstock

Why we need the IHRA definition of antisemitism

Image: Shutterstock

Letter: Religious bigotry, and racism, have no legitimacy in public discourse

SORT BY TOPICS