MEDIA RELEASES

AIJAC Disappointed With New SBS Codes of Practice

Oct 16, 2006

Media Release

 

AIJAC Executive Director Dr Colin Rubenstein expressed AIJAC’s disappointment with the newly amended SBS Codes of Practice. He explained that AIJAC had made a considered submission about the draft amendments, but that only one aspect covered by the AIJAC submission had been changed by SBS in the final version.

Dr Rubenstein noted, “SBS has removed Code 1.6, which provided that ethnic communities had the right to make representations to SBS about the coverage of events in their homeland, but that SBS must not be seen to be influenced by these groups. It is likely that many ethnic groups objected to this provision, the effect of which was that groups can speak to SBS but SBS can’t take any notice of them, so it is unsurprising that this ridiculous provision was removed.

“Unfortunately, the other provisions of the Codes for which we suggested amendments have remained untouched. Among problems with the Codes as rewritten, there is no requirement for balance or accuracy in documentaries, there is no requirement that reports include sufficient relevant facts to give a proper understanding of the issues, only errors of fact regarded by SBS as ‘significant’ need be corrected, there is no need to distinguish analysis or comment from reporting, and balance in news and current affairs need only be provided over the period in which a ‘controversy is active’, rather than within the one program.”

Dr Rubenstein also reiterated AIJAC’s disappointment that the flawed complaints procedure was not addressed in the review process. He concluded, “The net effect of these problems with the Codes is that SBS journalists can provide a news and current affairs service that is unsatisfactory in many respects, yet still be in compliance with the Codes. The Codes will therefore act to shield them from justified complaints rather than ensuring they comply with acceptable standards of journalism”.

For further information please contact Dr Colin Rubenstein on (03) 9681 6660 or 0418 339 721.

Tags:

RELATED ARTICLES


Image: Shutterstock

AIJAC relieved over deal to release hostages, but mindful of those left behind and ambiguity over Hamas’ role

Jan 16, 2025 | Featured, Media Releases
UN General Assembly chamber (Photo: Steve Estvanik, Shutterstock)

Australia’s votes at UN “starkly at odds with its own policy”

Dec 12, 2024 | Media Releases
Foreign Minister Penny Wong (screenshot)

AIJAC “deeply disappointed” with “moral relativism and factual confusion” in speech from Foreign Minister

Dec 10, 2024 | Featured, Media Releases
Josh Frydenberg

Senator Watt’s comments “disappointing and irresponsible”

Dec 9, 2024 | Media Releases
Screenshot

AIJAC horrified by arson attack on Melbourne synagogue

Dec 6, 2024 | Featured, Media Releases
Image: Lev Radin/ Shutterstock

AIJAC deeply disappointed by Australian vote change on “woefully one-sided” UN Resolution

Dec 4, 2024 | Featured, Media Releases

RECENT POSTS

Image: Shutterstock

There is no big winner in the Israel-Hamas ceasefire deal

C78d667802c347cc9d43d0d6028564ec Fotor Ai Art Effects 20250116180109

Factsheet: The ceasefire for hostages deal just reached between Israel and Hamas

Image: Shutterstock

AIJAC relieved over deal to release hostages, but mindful of those left behind and ambiguity over Hamas’ role

Protesters in Tel Aviv calling for a ceasefire (Image: Shutterstock)

Gaza ceasefire deal: What it means for the Middle East

Damaged section of Kamal Adwan Hospital (image: World Health Organisation)

UN’s anti-Israel biases can’t hide facts of terror

Image: Shutterstock

There is no big winner in the Israel-Hamas ceasefire deal

C78d667802c347cc9d43d0d6028564ec Fotor Ai Art Effects 20250116180109

Factsheet: The ceasefire for hostages deal just reached between Israel and Hamas

Image: Shutterstock

AIJAC relieved over deal to release hostages, but mindful of those left behind and ambiguity over Hamas’ role

Protesters in Tel Aviv calling for a ceasefire (Image: Shutterstock)

Gaza ceasefire deal: What it means for the Middle East

Damaged section of Kamal Adwan Hospital (image: World Health Organisation)

UN’s anti-Israel biases can’t hide facts of terror

SORT BY TOPICS