Australia/Israel Review

Strike Zone? 

Feb 27, 2023 | Yaakov Lappin

Images from the unprecedented “Juniper Oak” US-Israel joint military exercises in late January (Images: US Central Command/ Twitter)
Images from the unprecedented “Juniper Oak” US-Israel joint military exercises in late January (Images: US Central Command/ Twitter)

US-Israel coordination may presage action against Iran


On January 26, the historic five-day joint Israeli-American military exercise called “Juniper Oak” came to an end. The exercise saw unprecedented levels of cooperation between the US military’s Central Command (CENTCOM), which is responsible for the Middle East, and the Israel Defence Forces.

“Juniper Oak” tested Israeli-American readiness and boosted the operational connection between the two militaries to enable them to deal with “regional threats,” according to the IDF Spokesperson’s Unit, but the intended target audience for this message seems to have been Iran.

Some 6,500 US commanders and soldiers took part (along with 1,500 Israeli troops), as did missile ships and fighter jets from both militaries, which fired on simulated naval threats. The two air forces also practised a range of scenarios, including the use of transport and mid-air refuelling aircraft, unmanned aerial vehicles, search and rescue helicopters and B-52 bombers, which dropped munitions on targets in southern Israel.

Out at sea, meanwhile, the Israeli Navy’s Sa’ar 5 missile ships were refuelled by an American tanker, and in the air, fighter jets and bombers were refuelled by Israeli and American refuellers, including the American Boeing KC-46 Pegasus, which will be in the IAF’s inventory in the coming years.

An initial review of the exercise was held by IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Herzi Halevi and CENTCOM Commander Gen. Michael E. Kurilla aboard an American aircraft carrier in the heart of the Mediterranean Sea. Members of the IDF General Staff and the US Sixth Fleet also participated. 

“The IDF and CENTCOM take the same view of regional threats,” said Halevi. “Israel knows how to defend itself, but it is always good when our best partner is with us so that we learn from one another.” Kurilla, for his part, said the US is committed to Israel’s security and supports building up Israel’s qualitative military edge in the Middle East.

Still, despite the above, Israel has also been busy making its own, independent preparations for a potential strike on Iran, which have accelerated over the past year.

In 2022, the IAF placed long-range strike capabilities at the top of its priority list, undertaking the most detailed planning regarding intelligence, munitions, aerial platforms and refuelling capabilities. 

“We have greatly sped up our preparations for activities in Iran,” then-IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Aviv Kochavi stated in April 2022. “A substantial part of the enlarged defence budget, as just recently summarised, is earmarked for this.” 

In June 2022, the IDF launched “Chariots of Fire”, a month-long military exercise and the largest in decades, which included simulations of long-range strikes against Iran’s nuclear sites.

Towards the end of the exercise, the IAF deployed dozens of aircraft over the Mediterranean in a drill to simulate “long-range flight, aerial refuelling and striking distant targets,” according to the IDF.

A solo Israeli strike and a joint Israeli-American strike are both on the table, and both options must be taken seriously, a former intelligence official told JNS.

Brig. Gen. (res.) Yossi Kuperwasser, an ex-head of the Military Intelligence Research Division for the IDF and former Director-General of the Israeli Ministry of Strategic Affairs, said the scenario of a joint operation “is certainly reasonable”.

“What has recently occurred is a convergence of US and Israeli approaches,” said Kuperwasser, currently the Director of the Project on Regional Middle East Developments at the Jerusalem Centre for Public Affairs.

“While the United States understands the difficulties in renewing the nuclear agreement [with Iran], the Israelis abandoned the idea of enforcing a red line on Iran’s nuclear program that was based on enriching 250 kilograms of 20 percent-enriched uranium, which Netanyahu had formerly marked out during a United Nations speech in 2012,” he said.


With the “trip wire” for action being moved by both countries, each in their own way, they appeared to have settled on the idea of needing to act “one minute before Iran starts enriching uranium to the military-grade, 90 percent [U-235],” said Kuperwasser.

IDF Maj. Gen. (res.) Amos Gilead, Executive Director of the Institute for Policy and Strategy at Reichman University, Herzliya, and former Director of Policy and Political-Military Affairs at the Israeli Defence Ministry, said in a recent radio interview that US support for Israel was critical for efforts to prevent Iran from going nuclear. Iran, he warned, is on the way to a nuclear weapon, and to stop it, “you need coordination with the US.”

On that same radio station, in July 2022, IDF Maj. Gen. Yaakov Amidror, former National Security Council head, stated, “We can strike Iran without the Americans, too. Perhaps not as well, but we must not as a country depend on the Americans.” 

Kuperwasser pointed out that differences still remain in the way Jerusalem and Washington perceive the Iranian nuclear program. The US could in theory live with Iran continuing to enrich uranium to the 60% level, while for Israel, this would represent an unacceptable situation, he said.

“Juniper Oak,” he said, “was designed to send a message to Iran: You are the target. The entire concept is about discouraging them from reaching 90% enrichment. The Iranians need to take it seriously. They could tell themselves that those who want to deter don’t do it as loudly. On the other hand, they cannot ignore this message.”

Iran has responded to significant military threats in the past by taking a step back, particularly when that threat comes from the United States, he argued. Examples include cancelling a plan to mine the Straits of Hormuz in 2003 following American threats, and holding off on a nuclear breakthrough between 2013 and 2015, following Israel’s threat to act in 2012.

“They take real threats seriously when they see them,” said Kuperwasser.

Nevertheless, today, Iran has enriched sufficient levels of uranium to the 20% and 60% level to produce five nuclear warheads, if enriched further and if other aspects of the nuclear program are completed. [The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) confirmed in early February detection in Iran of uranium enriched to 84% – Ed.]

“It is unclear how long it would take them to reach launchable bombs. The consensus is two years, but I believe it is less because I think that the Iranians are conducting simulations [of nuclear bomb triggers],” said Kuperwasser.

“Some of what they are doing is public, such as metal uranium metal production. We also know that in the past, they conducted secret activity, like the undisclosed nuclear sites that were active before 2003. We only found out about this in 2018 [following the Mossad’s raid on the Iranian nuclear archive],” he noted.

Israel has the ability to act alone if necessary, said Kuperwasser, and has been developing this capability for the past 18 years.

“If Israel gets the impression that Americans will not do anything, it could happen. It’s not the best scenario, but it’s not unreasonable either,” he added. 

Meanwhile, the Sunni-Arab Gulf states, which are deeply threatened by Iran, are continuing to build their own self-defence capabilities, which they may need to activate in the event of a regional conflict following a strike on Iran’s nuclear program, particularly if the United States is involved in the attack, said Kuperwasser.

Yaakov Lappin is an Israel-based military affairs correspondent and analyst. He is the in-house analyst at the Miryam Institute, a research associate at the Alma Research and Education Centre, and a research associate at the Begin-Sadat Centre for Strategic Studies at Bar-Ilan University. © Jewish News Syndicate (JNS), reprinted by permission, all rights reserved. 


Israeli tanks in the Sinai Desert, 1973 (Image: Public domain)

From 1973 to Israel’s next war

Sep 28, 2023 | Australia/Israel Review

The Last Word: Jeremy Jones – In Memoriam

Sep 28, 2023 | Australia/Israel Review
Clinton appreciated Netanyahu’s political skills, but the two were divided over some key policy issues, leading to a tense relationship (Image: Shutterstock)

Essay: Bibi’s seven presidents

Sep 28, 2023 | Australia/Israel Review
Destined to be an iconic landmark: The new National Library of Israel (Image: Herzog & De Meuron/ National Library of Israel/ Twitter)

Biblio File: Unique monument for the “People of the Book”

Sep 28, 2023 | Australia/Israel Review
Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah (Image: Shutterstock)

Deconstruction Zone: US outreach vs. Iranian aggression

Sep 28, 2023 | Australia/Israel Review
Mahmoud Abbas' invocation of antisemitic canards drew criticism in from the EU, but no policy change (Image: Shutterstock)

Europa Europa: Inconvenient truths 

Sep 28, 2023 | Australia/Israel Review