Australia/Israel Review

Russia and the Israel-Iran confrontation

Mar 1, 2018 | Herb Keinon

Russia and the Israel-Iran confrontation
A frequent sight of late: Netanyahu meeting Putin

Herb Keinon

The scorecard for those actively involved in the events over the skies of Israel and Syria on Saturday, Feb. 10, looks something like this: Israel lost an F-16 fighter jet and an aura of complete invincibility over Syrian skies.

Iran lost a drone, the drone’s command and control centre, and some of its military assets in Syria, the details of which are sure to emerge eventuallty.

Syria lost a number of air defence batteries, including vital air defence facilities around Damascus.

One country that is not on this immediate scorecard, but which stands to lose the most from the confrontation, is Russia. And what it stands to lose if that confrontation turns out not to be a one-time event, but rather a wider Israel-Iran-Syria-Hezbollah war, is its multi-billion dollar investment in Syria itself.

Russia moved forces into Syria in 2015 with one purpose in mind: Save Syrian President Bashar Assad. And since then, Moscow has spent billions of rubles and spilled Russian blood to do just that: Help Assad regain control of the country from Syrian rebels and Islamic State.

And now, just as Moscow seems on the cusp of achieving its goals in Syria and serving as kingmaker in determining post-civil war arrangements, the last thing it needs or wants is large-scale Israeli military involvement that could threaten everything it hoped to gain.

Moscow wants to stabilise Syria right now. A confrontation between Israel and Iran there would badly destabilise the country and could cost Russia its most important asset in the region.

This Russian interest could be the key in keeping the events of Feb. 10 from hurtling Israel, Iran, Syria and Hezbollah into a full-throttle war.

When Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu goes to Russia periodically to speak to Russian President Vladimir Putin, it is clear that he is not going only to express opposition to Iran’s entrenchment in Syria. The Russians are all too familiar with Israel’s position on this matter. Rather, he is also telling the Russian President what to expect if the Iranian entrenchment continues, letting him know how Israel will react.

And he does this for two reasons. The first is to avoid surprising the Russians. One reason the de-confliction mechanism set up when the Russians first became militarily engaged in Syria has worked, is that neither Israel nor Russia surprises the other. Russia knows where Israel’s forces are and Israel knows where the Russians are.

The other reason Israel wants the Russians to know exactly what it will do if the Iranians move to set up permanent military camp in Syria is the hope that this knowledge will nudge Moscow into convincing the Iranians to stand back.

So far, this has not worked.

Russian diplomats, when asked whether Moscow can prevent Iran from setting up bases in Syria, say as if on cue that Iran is a sovereign country, and not a client state of Moscow that does its bidding.

Israel believes this is false humility and that the Russians could, if they wanted, have an impact on Iran’s actions in Syria. The Israel Air Force’s actions on Feb. 10 might induce the Russians to be less humble and – after all – see if they can’t influence Iran to scale down its activity in Syria.

The message Jerusalem hopes Moscow will take from those events is that it needs to do more to restrain the Iranians.

Amos Yadlin, the head of the Institute for National Security Studies, said in a conference call put together by The Israel Project that the Iranians are determined to build their military force in Syria and Lebanon, and Israel is determined not to let that happen. These two vectors, he said, are on a collision course.

Russia, uniquely, is in a position to push the Iranian vector off its current trajectory and prevent an all-out war. Its own interests inside Syria indicate that this is something it should want to do.

But reality does not conform to theory, and whether Moscow will take action to rein in the Iranians, and what price it will ask for doing so, are the reasons Netanyahu meets – and talks – so often with Putin. Whether or not Israel is on the cusp of a new war in the north is to a large extent dependent on decisions the Russians will now make.

Herb Keinon is the diplomatic correspondent for the Jerusalem Post. © Jerusalem Post (, reprinted by permission, all rights reserved.


Tags: ,


This placard expresses the ultimate purpose of the anti-Zionist movement – a world without the collective Jew (Image: X/Twitter)

Essay: The Placard Strategy

Jul 4, 2024 | Australia/Israel Review
A far-right graphic makes caricatured Jews responsible for everything the far-right hates

Deconstruction Zone: The conspiracy trap

Jul 4, 2024 | Australia/Israel Review
The “encampment” at the University of Sydney (Image: X/Twitter)

The Last Word: What is a university?

Jul 4, 2024 | Australia/Israel Review
Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah: Threatening not only Cyprus but all maritime activity in the Eastern Mediterranean (Image: X/Twitter)

Cyprus and the Hezbollah maritime threat

Jul 4, 2024 | Australia/Israel Review
IDF Lt. Col. Dotan Razili, a home front brigade commander, guarding the evacuated northern community of Kibbutz Eilon (Image: Charlotte Lawson)

On the frontlines in Israel’s north

Jul 4, 2024 | Australia/Israel Review
New York Times columnist Bret Stephens speaking to AIJAC in Melbourne: “There will never be any long-term peace in the region as long as the Islamic Republic rules Persia”

Bret Stephens on Israel’s War for Survival

Jul 4, 2024 | Australia/Israel Review