Australia/Israel Review


Egypt’s Other Islamist Party

Dec 20, 2011 | Eric Trager

Egypt's Other Islamist Party
news_item/02EGYPT-articleLarge.jpg

Eric Trager

 

The big story from Egypt’s parliamentary elections, the first round of which concluded on November 29, was the Muslim Brotherhood’s impressive victory. But the Brotherhood’s anticipated rise from outlawed organisation to parliamentary power won’t be surprising: the Brotherhood’s strong mobilising capabilities are well known, and Hosni Mubarak often warned the West that its choice was between his autocracy or the Brotherhood’s theocracy.

The real surprise is the emergence of the Salafist al-Nour party, a deeply theocratic organisation that bases its ideology on a literal reading of the Koran and Sunna and, most astoundingly, didn’t exist until a few months ago. Although Salafist political activity was, unlike the Brotherhood, completely banned under the Mubarak regime, al-Nour is giving the Brotherhood a run for its money in some districts. Not only is the Islamist Alliance, in which the al-Nour party is the major player, running 693 candidates – but those candidates’ banners and images have been ubiquitous, even in Egypt’s least religious neighbourhoods. It is now expected to place second when the final round of elections is completed in January, perhaps winning as much as 30 percent of the vote.

The al-Nour party’s strong campaign was particularly noticeable here in Fayoum, a rural governorate 81 miles southwest of Cairo that is home to 2.5 million people. Based on my experiences covering various Cairo polling places on Monday, I fully expected a strong showing in Fayoum for the Muslim Brotherhood, whose Islamist ideology is very much at home in this traditional countryside region. And, indeed, the Brotherhood was quite visible. But the al-Nour party was, without question, much more visible. From the moment we entered the governorate, al-Nour banners – and often only al-Nour banners – were everywhere: atop light poles, along traffic islands, and even on mosques. (One aspect of al-Nour’s campaign particularly impressed me: To get around the ban on using the Islamic crescent as a party symbol, al-Nour chose to be represented on ballots by another Islamic symbol: the fanous, a decorative lamp that Muslims display during Ramadan.)

My first stop was at a polling station along a major road, a schoolhouse that was one of the few structures in an otherwise pastoral setting. Although there was little foot traffic, approximately two dozen enthusiastic al-Nour party supporters – again, only al-Nour supporters – were milling about, apparently waiting to help voters. “I voted for al-Nour yesterday,” Ahmed Kamel, sporting the bushy-beard-sans-moustache look that is typical of Salafists, told me. “They are honest and I trust them a lot. They depend on the Holy Koran and the Sunna of the Prophet Muhammad, Peace Be Upon Him.”

At my second stop, a very busy polling station towards the centre of Fayoum city, the al-Nour party and Muslim Brotherhood’s Freedom and Justice – and no other parties – manned nearby voter assistance kiosks. But here, al-Nour’s presence was notably more advanced: whereas the Brotherhood was using an old desktop with a boxy monitor to tell people which voting box was theirs, the al-Nour activists were working off of two sleek, new-looking laptops and handing out impressively concise copies of their platform.

Yet the most impressive scene came at my third stop, in front of al-Nour’s Fayoum headquarters, where I found a number of activists clad in yellow, al-Nour-emblazoned, reflective vests. They had been collecting voters from centralised locations and bringing them to the polling places all day. “We announce where [voters] should meet,” Mohamed Abdel Rahman Mahmoud, a 32-year-old electrician, told me. “We have a microphone on our cars, and we move around to tell them.” Al-Nour’s voter roundup operation was hardly unique to Fayoum: a colleague of mine also spotted yellow-vested Salafists in the city of Luxor, and it is likely that they used this technique in similarly traditional settings where they have wide support.

When I asked these bushy-bearded politicos how they had emerged from obscurity to omnipresence in a matter of months, they insisted that al-Nour had organically grown from the bottom-up. “As Salafists, we are part of the Muslim community and we connect with Muslims as brothers, and there is a private connection as Salafists,” Mohamed Abdel Tawaq, al-Nour’s 31-year-old Fayoum coordinator, told me. “We met each other through mosques and universities. We live in a Muslim society.”

But the mass organisation that they’d pulled off so quickly clearly requires money. Where is it coming from? “We pay zakat [the Islamic tithe] to an organisation that belongs to the party,” said Abdel Tawaq. Rumour has it, I replied, that most of their funds come from Saudi Arabia, which – I didn’t say this part aloud – has a history of exporting its own Islamic radicalism elsewhere. “You see all the [al-Nour] branches around Egypt, and you think we have so much money,” said Ali Sharaf, a al-Nour party coordinator who was sitting nearby. “But we’re really struggling to pay the rent here. Our money comes from dues.” He said that dues were only 10 Egyptian pounds – roughly $1.75 – each month, and that they had registered thousands of new members. (Given the ubiquity of al-Nour’s banners and the scale of their operation, this is scarcely believable.)

I also asked the Salafists why hadn’t they just joined the Muslim Brotherhood. “Because the Muslim Brotherhood is a group and tied to certain rules,” said Ali Sharaf. “But I’m a Muslim and Islam is open to anything.”

Yet I’d already learned that the Salafists were not as open-minded as they claimed. At one of my polling place visits, a van full of women that had been brought to vote for al-Nour called me over to extol al-Nour’s virtues. “They are good people and serve the community,” said Nour al-Hoda Desouki, excitedly holding an al-Nour party sample ballot. “We are a conservative people but we’ll talk to you.” But her good deed couldn’t go unpunished. An al-Nour representative swiftly approached my translator and told us to stop talking to women.

Still, I humoured the Salafists. If they were truly “open to anything”, would they support allowing Egyptian hotels to continue serving alcohol to tourists? “In my opinion, no,” said Mehdi, the al-Nour activist handing out party programs by the polling station. “Because it’s forbidden.”

“But the people who drink aren’t Muslims,” my translator, himself a committed Muslim, interjected.

“They have to respect the country,” Mehdi replied. “Like in Germany, people respect the country and have to speak German. You have to respect the country you’re in, even if you disagree.”

Well, what would be your policy towards Christians? Would you force them to pay the jizya – the special tax that Muslim rulers historically imposed on non-Muslim minorities to pay for Islamic wars? “They already pay it through their taxes,” Sherif, another local al-Nour coordinator, said. “Each society has its own revenue sources – in Islam, it’s zakat for Muslims and jizya for non-Muslims. Even they have to serve in the community, whether they’re Christians or Jews. They pay jizya because we offer security.”

Finally, I turned to foreign policy. What is your view of Camp David, I asked. “I heard about Camp David when I was a kid and I heard from people and our scholars that it is unjust for us,” Sherif said. “But I never read it.” (This Islamist apparently subscribed to the Herman Cain school of international relations.) “I don’t want war with Israel,” he continued. “So Israel must leave the part that it took from me.” Which part? “Israel should withdraw from all of Palestine – not just the West Bank or Gaza.” I gave him a confused look. “I never denied that some Jews lived there before.” On that note, I said goodbye.

As we headed back to the cab, our driver – who had sat in for that last part – nodded approvingly. “They’re really good people,” he said. Though he’s not an Islamist himself, he had voted for al-Nour earlier in the week. Why? “They’re honest.”

Eric Trager, the Washington Institute for Near East Policy’s Ira Weiner fellow, is a doctoral candidate in political science at the University of Pennsylvania, where he is writing his dissertation on Egyptian opposition parties. © The New Republic, reprinted by permission, all rights reserved.

 

Tags:

RELATED ARTICLES

India has historically had a distant relationship with Israel, but this has changed dramatically in recent years, as evidenced by the close relationship between former Israeli PM Netanyahu and Indian PM Modi (Image: Isranet)

Essay: Israel looks East

Jul 1, 2022 | Australia/Israel Review
The struggle to succeed 86-year old PA President Mahmoud Abbas is consuming Palestinian politics (Image: Shutterstock)

Does Mahmoud Abbas finally have a successor?

Jul 1, 2022 | Australia/Israel Review
Image: Shutterstock

Polls suggest yet another deadlocked election

Jul 1, 2022 | Australia/Israel Review
The UN Human Rights Council in session (Image: US Mission/Eric Bridiers/Flickr)

Deconstruction Zone: A UN Commission’s war on Israel

Jul 1, 2022 | Australia/Israel Review
(Credit: Shutterstock)

Noted and Quoted – July 2022

Jul 1, 2022 | Australia/Israel Review
Bennett with US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken: Bennett’s policy has been to actively engage with the US Administration on Iran (Image: Flickr)

Will elections affect Israel’s Iran strategy?

Jul 1, 2022 | Australia/Israel Review

SIGN UP FOR AIJAC EMAILS

EDITIONS BY YEAR